TOML test matrix

This tests various parsers agains the toml-test suite.

"Decoder tests" check if valid TOML documents are processed correctly, "encoder tests" checks writing TOML files, and "invalid input" checks that the parser rejects invalid TOML documents. Implementations are marked as "compliant" (✅) if both the "valid" and "encoder" tests pass, otherwise they're marked as non-compliant (❌). Usually it's not a big deal to accept some technically invalid TOML; almost all failing "invalid" tests are uncommon edge cases.

The benchmarks are a simple decode of a 15k and 5M file. Results are displayed as "good", "slow", and "very slow" only. Doing a fully fair comparison is not straight-forward, and it's not a contest on who can write the fastest parser – it's just to establish that performance is within reasonable bounds.

		Name	Decoder tests	Encoder tests	Invalid input	15k file	5M file
❌	C++	nullptr-toml	pass: 188 fail: 3	(doesn't include encoder)	pass: 371 fail: 0	(TODO)	(TODO)	output
✅	C++	toml++	pass: 191 fail: 0	pass: 191 fail: 0	pass: 371 fail: 0	good	good	output
✅	C++	toml11	pass: 191 fail: 0	pass: 191 fail: 0	pass: 371 fail: 0	good	slow	output
✅	C	toml-c	pass: 191 fail: 0	(doesn't include encoder)	pass: 357 fail: 14	good	slow	output
❌	C	tomlc99	pass: 183 fail: 8	(doesn't include encoder)	pass: 293 fail: 78	good	slow	output
❌	C#	tomlyn	pass: 188 fail: 3	(TODO)	pass: 366 fail: 5	slow	good	output
✅	Dart	toml.dart	pass: 191 fail: 0	pass: 191 fail: 0	pass: 371 fail: 0	good	good	output
❌	Fortran	toml-f	pass: 180 fail: 11	pass: 179 fail: 12	pass: 339 fail: 32	good	very slow	output
✅	Go	go-toml	pass: 191 fail: 0	pass: 191 fail: 0	pass: 371 fail: 0	good	slow	output
✅	Go	toml	pass: 191 fail: 0	pass: 191 fail: 0	pass: 358 fail: 13	good	good	output
❌	Guile	toml	pass: 186 fail: 5	pass: 187 fail: 4	pass: 357 fail: 14	(TODO)	(TODO)	output
❌	Haskell	toml-parser	pass: 190 fail: 1	pass: 191 fail: 0	pass: 369 fail: 2	good	good	output
❌	Haskell	toml-reader	pass: 189 fail: 2	(doesn't include encoder)	pass: 369 fail: 2	good	slow	output
❌	JS	deno-toml	pass: 162 fail: 28	pass: 102 fail: 88	pass: 246 fail: 125	(TODO)	(TODO)	output
✅	JS	j-toml	pass: 191 fail: 0	pass: 191 fail: 0	pass: 357 fail: 14	good	good	output
✅	JS	smol-toml	pass: 190 fail: 0	pass: 190 fail: 0	pass: 357 fail: 14	good	good	output
✅	JS	toml-eslint-parser	pass: 191 fail: 0	(doesn't include encoder)	pass: 362 fail: 9	good	good	output
❌	Lisp	clop	pass: 187 fail: 4	(doesn't include encoder)	pass: 371 fail: 0	(TODO)	(TODO)	output
❌	Lua	tinytoml	pass: 186 fail: 4	(doesn't include encoder)	pass: 370 fail: 1	(TODO)	(TODO)	output
❌	OCAML	otoml	pass: 188 fail: 3	pass: 183 fail: 8	pass: 319 fail: 52	(TODO)	(TODO)	output
❌	Odin	toml_parser	pass: 181 fail: 10	(doesn't include encoder)	pass: 166 fail: 205	(TODO)	(TODO)	output
❌	Python	toml	pass: 173 fail: 18	pass: 177 fail: 14	pass: 298 fail: 73	good	slow	output
✅	Python	tomli	pass: 191 fail: 0	pass: 191 fail: 0	pass: 371 fail: 0	good	good	output
✅	Python	tomlkit	pass: 191 fail: 0	pass: 191 fail: 0	pass: 365 fail: 6	slow	very slow	output
✅	Python	tomllib	pass: 191 fail: 0	(doesn't include encoder)	pass: 371 fail: 0	good	good	output
❌	Racket	toml-racket	pass: 189 fail: 2	pass: 184 fail: 7	pass: 370 fail: 1	(TODO)	(TODO)	output
❌	Ruby	perfect_toml	pass: 191 fail: 0	pass: 190 fail: 1	pass: 362 fail: 9	good	good	output
❌	Ruby	toml-rb	pass: 171 fail: 20	pass: 163 fail: 28	pass: 301 fail: 70	slow	very slow	output
❌	Ruby	tomlrb	pass: 190 fail: 1	(doesn't include encoder)	pass: 351 fail: 20	good	slow	output
❌	Rust	basic-toml	pass: 170 fail: 21	(TODO)	pass: 367 fail: 4	good	good	output
✅	Rust	boml	pass: 191 fail: 0	(doesn't include encoder)	pass: 237 fail: 134	good	good	output
❌	Rust	taplo	pass: 185 fail: 6	(TODO)	pass: 368 fail: 3	good	very slow	output
✅	Rust	toml	pass: 191 fail: 0	pass: 191 fail: 0	pass: 371 fail: 0	good	good	output
✅	Rust	toml_edit	pass: 191 fail: 0	pass: 191 fail: 0	pass: 371 fail: 0	good	good	output
❌	Swift	TOMLDecoder	pass: 190 fail: 1	(doesn't include encoder)	pass: 366 fail: 5	(TODO)	(TODO)	output