TOML test matrix

This tests various parsers agains the toml-test suite.

"Decoder tests" check if valid TOML documents are processed correctly, "encoder tests" checks writing TOML files, and "invalid input" checks that the parser rejects invalid TOML documents. Implementations are marked as "compliant" (✅) if both the "valid" and "encoder" tests pass, otherwise they're marked as non-compliant (❌). Usually it's not a big deal to accept some technically invalid TOML; almost all failing "invalid" tests are uncommon edge cases.

The benchmarks are a simple decode of a 15k and 5M file. Results are displayed as "good", "slow", and "very slow" only. Doing a fully fair comparison is not straight-forward, and it's not a contest on who can write the fastest parser – it's just to establish that performance is within reasonable bounds.

		Name	Decoder tests	Encoder tests	Invalid input	15k file	5M file
❌	C++	nullptr-toml	pass: 201 fail: 4	(doesn't include encoder)	pass: 524 fail: 5	(TODO)	(TODO)	output
✅	C++	toml++	pass: 205 fail: 0	pass: 205 fail: 0	pass: 529 fail: 0	good	good	output
✅	C++	toml11	pass: 205 fail: 0	pass: 205 fail: 0	pass: 529 fail: 0	good	slow	output
✅	C	toml-c	pass: 205 fail: 0	(doesn't include encoder)	pass: 514 fail: 15	good	slow	output
❌	C	tomlc99	pass: 194 fail: 11	(doesn't include encoder)	pass: 435 fail: 94	good	slow	output
❌	C#	tomlet	pass: 188 fail: 17	(TODO)	pass: 409 fail: 120	(TODO)	(TODO)	output
❌	C#	tomlyn	pass: 201 fail: 4	(TODO)	pass: 520 fail: 9	slow	good	output
✅	Dart	toml.dart	pass: 205 fail: 0	pass: 205 fail: 0	pass: 529 fail: 0	good	good	output
❌	Fortran	toml-f	pass: 191 fail: 14	pass: 192 fail: 13	pass: 492 fail: 37	good	very slow	output
✅	Go	go-toml	pass: 205 fail: 0	pass: 205 fail: 0	pass: 529 fail: 0	good	slow	output
✅	Go	toml	pass: 205 fail: 0	pass: 205 fail: 0	pass: 515 fail: 14	good	good	output
❌	Guile	toml	pass: 199 fail: 6	pass: 200 fail: 5	pass: 515 fail: 14	(TODO)	(TODO)	output
❌	JS	deno-toml	pass: 174 fail: 30	pass: 115 fail: 89	pass: 420 fail: 109	good	good	output
✅	JS	j-toml	pass: 205 fail: 0	pass: 205 fail: 0	pass: 515 fail: 14	good	good	output
❌	JS	smol-toml	pass: 203 fail: 1	pass: 204 fail: 0	pass: 512 fail: 17	good	good	output
❌	JS	toml-eslint-parser	pass: 195 fail: 10	(doesn't include encoder)	pass: 519 fail: 10	good	good	output
❌	Lisp	clop	pass: 200 fail: 5	(doesn't include encoder)	pass: 529 fail: 0	(TODO)	(TODO)	output
❌	Lua	tinytoml	pass: 201 fail: 2	(doesn't include encoder)	pass: 526 fail: 3	(TODO)	(TODO)	output
❌	OCAML	otoml	pass: 201 fail: 4	pass: 197 fail: 8	pass: 463 fail: 66	(TODO)	(TODO)	output
❌	Odin	toml_parser	pass: 185 fail: 20	(doesn't include encoder)	pass: 428 fail: 101	(TODO)	(TODO)	output
❌	Python	toml	pass: 183 fail: 22	pass: 191 fail: 14	pass: 418 fail: 111	good	slow	output
✅	Python	tomli	pass: 205 fail: 0	pass: 205 fail: 0	pass: 529 fail: 0	good	good	output
✅	Python	tomlkit	pass: 205 fail: 0	pass: 205 fail: 0	pass: 522 fail: 7	slow	very slow	output
✅	Python	tomllib	pass: 205 fail: 0	(doesn't include encoder)	pass: 529 fail: 0	good	good	output
❌	Racket	toml-racket	pass: 202 fail: 3	pass: 198 fail: 7	pass: 525 fail: 4	(TODO)	(TODO)	output
❌	Ruby	perfect_toml	pass: 205 fail: 0	pass: 204 fail: 1	pass: 520 fail: 9	good	good	output
❌	Ruby	toml-rb	pass: 180 fail: 25	pass: 177 fail: 28	pass: 446 fail: 83	slow	very slow	output
❌	Ruby	tomlrb	pass: 202 fail: 3	(doesn't include encoder)	pass: 502 fail: 27	good	slow	output
❌	Rust	basic-toml	pass: 184 fail: 21	(TODO)	pass: 525 fail: 4	good	good	output
❌	Rust	boml	pass: 185 fail: 20	(doesn't include encoder)	pass: 364 fail: 165	good	good	output
❌	Rust	taplo	pass: 198 fail: 7	(TODO)	pass: 525 fail: 4	good	very slow	output
✅	Rust	toml	pass: 205 fail: 0	pass: 205 fail: 0	pass: 529 fail: 0	good	good	output
✅	Rust	toml_edit	pass: 205 fail: 0	pass: 205 fail: 0	pass: 529 fail: 0	good	good	output
❌	Swift	TOMLDecoder	pass: 198 fail: 7	(doesn't include encoder)	pass: 520 fail: 9	(TODO)	(TODO)	output